Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

User Profile

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
  • Source
Clear All
new posts

  • Alexander
    replied to Slipstream
    I get your point, though I feel with the technology itself the legwork is already done and modification for other classes should not add that much more...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Alexander
    replied to Slipstream
    What aparry is getting at I believe is that COs should have the option to outright not have the technology on their ships. Even if they are on a list...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Alexander
    replied to Slipstream
    That narrative doesn't fit the practical implementation of industrial production though. For one, canonically even a relatively small scientific ship...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by Alexander; 08-02-2018, 02:13 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alexander
    replied to Slipstream
    Yes, and I proposed an alternative that still allows for differences based on specific features a class has while avoiding all the problems I outlined...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Alexander
    replied to Slipstream
    Regarding all classes, one of the problems there is though that not all aerodynamic classes are included. I might seem biased as I do run an Ascension...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Alexander
    replied to Slipstream
    I know I'm coming a bit late into this discussion but with the current proposal I feel there are a few problems that could be solved relatively easily....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:

No activity results to display
Show More

Profile Sidebar

Collapse
Alexander
Alexander
TF9 Commanding Officer
Last Activity: Yesterday, 08:19 PM
Joined: 05-05-2014
Location: The Netherlands
Working...
X